It is common practice, when designing a solar system, to ‘undersize’ the solar inverter, by connecting more panels than the inverter appears to be rated for.
This can freak out some solar customers when they see, for example 3.25kW of panels proposed to be connected to a 3kW inverter in their solar quote.
Confused?
Let me explain the nuances of solar inverter sizing…
A typical solar inverter sold as “a 3kW inverter” can usually have more than 3kW of solar panels safely connected to it, because 3kW of panels never actually produces 3kW of power for the reasons outlined here.
However, new CEC guidelines, effective from Feb 2013 are much more stringent about how many ‘extra’ panels you are now allowed to connect to an inverter, and it seems that some installers have not picked up on the new rules!
Here’s an email that came in today (28 May 2013) from Ian:
My solar installer has explained in detail that a 3kW system would suit my needs.
I only have one concern before I go ahead. They have quoted 12 x 250w Daqo Panels & a Motech 2500-AU inverter.
I believe this is only a 2.5kW inverter. Could you advise if this is sufficient.
To answer Ian’s questions definitively I have to reference 2 documents:
1) The CEC Solar Install guidelines issue 6
2) The spec for the Motech Inverter in question
Looking, first to the guidelines; Section 9.4 – Array Peak Power – inverter sizing tells us:
In order to facilitate the efficient design of PV systems the inverter nominal AC power output cannot be
a) less than 75% of the array peak power and
b) it shall not be outside the inverter manufacturers max input power specifications.
So let’s check that we meet both criteria:
a) Array peak power = the rated output of all the panels = 250W x 12 = 3000W. Nominal output power (from the spec sheet ) is 2500W. 2500/3000 x 100% = 83%. So the inverter’s nominal AC output is 83% of the panel array size, which is more than 75%, Cool bananas! We’ve passed the first hurdle.
b) Inverter’s “DC Max input power”( from the spec sheet ) is 2900W. Oh dear! This is a no-no. We can’t have more than 2900W of panels, and the installer wants to connect 3000W. This is not allowed under the guidelines.
So my answer to Ian is: No. The inverter is not sufficient for 3000W of panels. Please go back to your installer and ask him to look at his design again.
Finn, I first came across an article by you in the Sydney Morning Herald and have been following you since via your name and want to congratulate you on the service you are providing. I am installing a Samil 4500TL-D inverter (4.23 kW) with 18 x 235W Trina polycrystalline panels in the Buderim QLD area through Energy Australia. Following your advice I contacted Energy Australia today to obtain the cost of extending the inverter warranty by an extra 5 years and was told $344 and was wondering if this is about right or a little over the odds.
Ian
Hi Ian, seems a little steep. Last time I checked it was closer to $200. Cost of a new inverter plus installation in 5 years will probably be about 900 bucks – but inverters are the most likely component to fail – so your call!
If the inverter is likely to fail, would it be feasible to install an inverter greater than the rated output of the solar panels or is inverter failure the result of other factors?
Yes, I think the main reason for failure is they load up the invertor near to its maximum. Mainly for cheapness to maximise their profits(a miniscule small percentage gain in efficiency is there, verse a 500 hundred dollars dearer invertor) as the rebate system doesnt care about the invertor capability. Hence this practise to use under rated invertors.
Finn
will this configuration work.2 x Sharp JH-1600E 1.6kW
14 x ReneSola 250W Virtus2 JC250M-24/BBV-2 (3.5kW )
Hi Graham,
To answer that question properly, I’d need to:
1) look at the electrical specs of the panels and inverter
2) look at the temperature profile of your location (he panel temperatures change with ambient temperature and the standards insit that the min and max temperatures possible at your installation site are used in the calculations)
3) look at the geometry of your roof.
A reputable company has to use a CEC accredited designer who will provide you a signed design document with the calcs to prove that this combination will work in your part of Australia and how much power it will deliver.
Hope That Helps,
Finn
I used your website to get three quotes and now I am more confused then ever. Installing a 3kw system. One quoted a 3kw 1 phase inverter and the other quoted a 5kw 3-phase inverter (very expensive). Since I have 3 phase meters i.e. 3 meters the second one said I absolutely need a 3phase inverter and the first one says no as the total load across all 3 phases would be calculated before feeding in if in excess and th solar power generated would be spread across all 3 phases, the other one says its not right and I need a 3 phase inverter. Who is correct
Hi There, I have a Sunnyboy 5kw inverter and 24 x 190w Panels this gives me a maximum of 4,560w from the panels so my inverter has 440w of headroom
Mine was designed by Solashop in Victoria and apart from the Co. going bust it seems to be a good setup.
I was told when I was getting the quotes that I should put the Inverter as close to the panels as possable as there is a greater loss over DC so my inverter sits on an east wall as close as I could get it and it then sends AC to the board,
There was no diference in the install price but my inverter is now located at the back of the house.
You can find a site for calculating voltage drop here: http://www.nooutage.com/vdrop.htm
I’m going to assume that you’re pushing a (theoretical) maximum of 30A and 150v out of your panels, so given you’ve got 8awg wire installed (or similar), on a 20m run of cable you’re expect about ~2.5% losses, double it to 40m and you’ve got ~5.1% losses. Calculate that over a year (in %) to see what sort of dollars you’d potentially loose.
I’d personally just install a higher gauge wire to minimise losses over the additional distance and place the inverter in a spot where it wasn’t an eyesore.
8awg wire rated to 60A (for instance) is going to cost you all of about $3/metre at most and will roughly half those losses over distance.
The guy that installed the inverter was being cheap or didn’t want to go out and get a larger gauge wire or install multiple cable runs in parallel.
As long as you dont exceed the DC input voltage and the input current, youre fine. There is no maximum DC power input that refers to a maximum panel peak output capacity, that max DC power figure is the maximum the inverter can use at any one time. The inverter is a load to the solar panels, meaning it is only going to consume the power from them it is capable of drawing, the panels themselves are like batteries, they ONLY flow current proportional to the connected load. The inverter is not capable of providing more load to the connected array simply because the ability to supply current is there. Dual MPPT SMAs can be loaded beyond 400% in some cases ( the 3000TL-21 for example ) and run perfectly happy for a very long time. Although that is an overkill, it can indeed be done. Systems with east-north-west tri-dirrectional arrays can easily put out maximum output from early morning to late afternoon with a 180% over sizing. I know the CEC guidelines no longer like this, however they are out of touch with the operational concept of electricity if they believe it is for efficiency.
Unbelievable.
“b) Inverter’s “DC Max input power”( from the spec sheet ) is 2900W. Oh dear! This is a no-no. We can’t have more than 2900W of panels, and the installer wants to connect 3000W. This is not allowed under the guidelines. So my answer to Ian is: No. The inverter is not sufficient for 3000W of panels. Please go back to your installer and ask him to look at his design again.”
The array rating of 3000Wp (watts peak) refers to cell temperature of 25 degrees centigrade, at 100 watts per square meter insolation and certain atmospheric pressure (1atm from memory).
I’m going out on a limb here and saying you will NEVER get these conditions in real life, hence your 3000Wp array will never actually produce this amount. Even if it does, the inverter will simply current limit the output, and providing your array voltage is within limits no harm will be done to the inverter.
What idiots we have governing the solar industry and giving advice to the public.
keep up the good work
I don’t agree with some of the CEC guidelines either. But them’s the rules of the game! A CEC Accredited installer is duty bound to follow the guidelines. The guidelines are there to protect consumers from buying underperforming systems, and the industry would be a nightmare without them.
No they arent, if they were, we wouldnt see systems with split arrays on one series string, we wouldnt see panels installed in mostly shade, and we wouldnt see panels installed facing in any southern direction.
I know what they “claim” CEC guidelines are for, but to consider oversized arrays could ever underperform is a joke in every sense of the word. They are made up by people with what certainly apears to be very little practical knowledge of either solar systems, and electrical knowledge in general. The fact they have clearly subscribed to the ‘solar panels push out a given wattage’ theory is proof of that. No power source pushes anything other than a voltage out, and it requires a load ( or at least a complete circuit ) for current to flow. Inverter is load to the panels, and it will only draw from them the current required to do its job. It is not electrically possible for it to receive more current than load permits.
I would never oversize if there was no limit on inverter output capacity, but there is, so i do. My aim is to have the inverter sitting at or near its maximum output for as much of the day as possible, not peaking under capacity at mid day and making marginal outputs when power is more likely to be required. That is efficient system design!!
Hi, I have 16 panels and a 3kw Samil inverter that has just died.. I got a quote for a new European made 3kw inverter (not sure which brand) for 1800 bucks installed. Seems steep to me? Also, would I be better off going for a 4kw inverter with 16 panels??
Cheers, great site btw.
Ben w.a
Depending on your location and your current Feed In Tariff – you have to be careful. If you increase the size of the inverter you may lose your FiT – as you probably only have permission for 3kW.
A good, local installer will be all over the issues. Also – if you upgrade the inverter you generally need to upgrade the installation to the latest Australian standard – which may add to the price.
As a guide the wholesale price of a top-of-the-range SMA 3kW inverter is $1,475.00 + GST, and for a budget 3kW inverter (Growatt) is $800+GST.
Hope That Helps,
Finn
Hi, I am trying to replace a second failed inverter (which was under warranty but the installer fails to answer calls and has removed website). I’ve got the specs for the old one and am trying to approx. match those when choosing a new one. How important is the ‘max input current’? Our old one says 18A, but a new one I’m looking at says 10A. We have 2Kw of panels and the inverter I’m looking at is 3kw. All other specs seem OK, eg max input voltage, MPP voltage range, initial input voltage etc.
Max input current is very important as is the voltage window.
There are certain calculations you need to make based on panel specs, panel layout and even local temperature max/mins to specify the right inverter. Please ask a local installer to specify and install the new inverter. If you use this link:
https://www.solarquotes.com.au/quote/
Then click on the button for a repair quote – we’ll organise a quote for a new inverter from someone we trust.
I have a 3KW inverter with only 1.5kw of solar panels. I got an upgrade on a new build because they ran out of 1.5kw inverters. I am now looking to beef up the system and either install new panels to maximize power production or go to a larger 5KW system. I have been researching what the largest system you can put on your home and still maintain the feed in tariff but cant seem to track that down online. I feel the largest system is 5KW for Queensland, is that right?
We average about 15KW per day of usage in our home which is low, so a 3KW system should generate that. Is it worth it to upgrade to a 5KW system or simply beef up my 3KW inverter with 3KW of solar panels? Thanks
Ben from Morayfield, QLD
Hi Ben,
The QLD rules are that if you upgrade your inverter size, you lose the 44c FiT.
But you can add panels to an existing inverter (up to 133% of the inverter max power rating) and not lose any FiT.
So technically, if your distributor finds out you’ve got a bigger inverter they could kill your FiT.
More details here:
https://www.solarquotes.com.au/systems/feed-in-tariffs/qld/#upgrade
Hi I’m looking to install a 250watt solar panels on my campervan and was wondering if a 3000W inverter was too much..? I’m gonna be plugin a laptop and a portable air con on it too.. thanks for the help!
Hi, I’m installing 12, 250Watt panels (3kw) to my Samil 3.3kw inverter. My question is what kind of wire rating must I use to run 15m from panels to inverter…. and from inverter to house fuse box (also 15m) ??
I realise former transports is DC – latter AC.
Your advice/help is much appreciated.
Kind Regards, Andrew
So my answer to Ian is: No. The inverter is not sufficient for 3000W of panels. Please go back to your installer and ask him to look at his design again.
Would the design by sufficient if the MPPT arrangement over north/west config? So 1.5kW North / 1.5kW West.
Hi Carl,
Since I wrote this post the CEC have relaxed the 2nd part of the guidelines about the ‘max DC input power’. The bit that is enforced is the 75% rule. So today, a 3kW inverter can have up to 4kW of panels attached to it and not violate the guidelines.
(sidenote: a lot of installers think this is a daft rule – because adding more than 4kW would not harm a 3kW inverter – the inverter only takes what it can handle – but if you want to claim the STCs you have to follow the guidelines)
Finn, if that is the case can you amend the above? Ive overloadad my panel array and on reading the advice above i na link from one of your other posts panicked like mad! I had to read all these responses to get down to here to find that overloading my inverter by 135% is fine! Also my inverter gives its input in volts not watts?
Hi Finn
My house has 3 Phase power with the possible load spread evenly over the Phases. However I know that when it comes down to actual load, things will be all over the place. The double wall oven that is on Phase 1 will be on and sucking 5000watts out of the system while the air-conditioners that are on Phase 2 will be off because it is winter and the heat from the oven is more than welcome. So what happens with the 7kw from my proposed PV installation.
Can the system be set up so that the output from the PVs goes to firstly cover demand on say Phase 1 and then any and all surplus be diverted/cascaded to Phase 2 and so on cascaded to Phase 3 before whatever is left over is sent to the grid? I have been told this is possible – but how?
(Otherwise taking a worst case scenario where the only item that is on is the wall oven)
If the output from the PVs is split evenly to cover load on each of the 3 Phases then there would only be 2333 watts of the 7000 produced to cover the oven use and the remaining 4666 watts would be fed back into the grid while at the same time 2666 watts would be pulled from the grid to keep the oven running. Is it is possible to cascade from one Phase to the next with surplus energy?
Single Phase, no doubt, would have made life much simpler.
What is your advice re this issue.
Hello Rudi, Ronald here. If your 7 kilowatt solar system has a 3 phase inverter then the output of the solar system will be evenly distributed across the three phases. So if your oven on phase 1 is drawing 5 kilowatts and the other 2 phases are drawing nothing while your solar system is producing 6 kilowatts, then what will happen is phase 1 will draw 3 kilowatts from the grid and 2 kilowatts from the solar system to power the oven, while the other phases will each export 2 kilowatts of power to the grid.
This is not a problem for the household as the electricity meter should only care about the net amount of electricity being consumed or exported by the household. So with the previous example, the meter would regard the house as using no grid electricity and exporting 1 kilowatt, even though 3 kilowatts of grid electricity were being imported on one phase and two kilowatts were being exported on the other phases.
If your solar system has a single phase inverter than it will be attached to which ever phase your installer believes will draw the most power during the day.
While it should be technically possible to set up a system so a solar system supplies power to which ever phase needs it, I don’t see any advantage to the household by doing that. It would be an extra expense for no benefit.
Hi Ronald
Thankyou for your prompt reply.
The proposal is for a three phase inverter or possibly micro inverters.
In Paragraph 2 you say “the electricity meter should only care about the net amount of electricity consumed”.
Here’s the rub.
We have 3 separate meters.
Two are EM1000s for Phases 1 & 3
The third is an EM1200 which looks after the general power as well as the reduced tariff hot-water on Phase 2.
I don’t believe these 3 meters communicate with each other.
Would we need to get ONE smart meter which meters all 3 Phases for it to work out the net consumption less production across the 3 Phases?
Of course if our electricity supplier were prepared to bill us at the end of the month by adding up the total consumption across the 3 meters and subtracting the production, I would be over the moon, but some how I can’t see that happening as it would benefit me too greatly. I can only dream.
Also do you have a rough idea how much such a meter swap would cost?
Regards
Rudi Kay
When your solar system is installed an import/export meter will be put in that will keep track of the net amount of electricity that goes in and out of the home. It is also likely you will get a smart meter installed as well, as these are being gradually phased in across Australia. The cost of a new meter will depend on where you are. Electricity retailers may offer to install “free” smart meters but they may flat out lie and charge a monthly fee for them and the smart meter can be locked to that particular retailer. It can pay to be very careful about what’s on offer.
Hey Finn, thanks for this website. I’m still trying to get my head around all this information. Some of these things are just way over my head. I’ve received a quote for the following systems and would like to know your thoughts on it. I’ve got huge gumtrees near the property. So micro-inverters have been suggested as the preferred option.
System 1 – $9k+
5.12kw – Enphase LG 320 watt neon
18kwh’s average production per day across the year
16 x 320watt Neon solar modules
16 x S270 Enphase micro inverters
1 x DRM metered Envoy
System 2 – $7k+
4.93kw – Enphase Trina Honey – 290watt / 295
17kwh’s average production per day across the year
17 x 290 Trina honey solar modules
17 x S270 Enphase micro inverters
1 x DRM metered Envoy
I’m still getting quotes from other companies. But would like to know your thoughts on these intial quotes. My bill currently shows an average of 21-22 kWh in daily usage.
Thanks in advance.
Hi Justin. Ronald here.
I don’t know your location, so I can’t know how many kilowatt-hours you could expect your system to generate without shade. The rule of thumb is around 4 kilowatt-hours a day per kilowatt of panels in most of Australia, more in central and north Australia and around 3.5 in Melbourne. According to your information, with either system you’ll be getting an average of around 3.5 kilowatt-hours a day per kilowatt-hour of solar panels. If that figure takes into account the shade from surrounding trees, then that’s not too bad.
If your roof has a considerable amount of shading then microinverters might result in around 15% greater electricity output than a standard string inverter. I think the high reliability of Enphase microinverters makes paying a considerable premium for them worthwhile, but it is also reasonable to decided to go for a cheaper string inverter system if you don’t think the increase in electricity output and high reliability is worthwhile.
If you decide to get a string inverter, SMA and Fronius are two reliable brands and currently Fronius comes with a 10 year warranty.
As you are currently using an average of 21-22 kilowatt-hours a day, either of the systems above should take a big chunk out of your electricity bills. Just how much will depend on if there are people at home during the day using the solar electricity instead of grid power, rather than most of it being sent into the grid for a feed-in tariff.
Hi all, awesome website, learning heaps. Has anyone heard of or had experience with flextronic solar panels. Have been advised they are tier 1 but they don’t appear on the tier 1 list. Also, how do the Stc s change so much between different quotes of same size. Have differences of hundreds of dollars.
As far as I am aware, Flextronic panels are not normally considered to be tier one. The little I know about the panels is good and so, based on what I have heard, I would expect them to be reliable.
The second part of this article touches on why what is offered for STCs can vary:
https://www.solarquotes.com.au/blog/the-stc-price-is-your-solar-installer-ripping-you-off/
STCs can vary in price over time and there can be variation in what is charged for processing them. If the difference is very large then an installer may not be calculating their worth properly. But what matters to the customer is the final price for a system.
Thanks for the advice, I find myself very uninformed when it comes to this and lean on advice from the sales person. Maybe my first mistake. But he did advise that flextronic are made to same standard as tier 1 panels, and suggested they are a far better product than ET branded ones I was considering? I was told the degradation rate is less and the panels are normally utilised in large scale utility grade sites. Also, topped it of with a performance guarantee? Price is not overly more expensive (800) than similar systems with ET or Trina panels and same fronius inverter, slightly larger though. Appreciate your thoughts on this.
I’m afraid I don’t have enough information to say if they are better or worse than panels such as ET Solar. But I would expect panels made by Flextronics to be of good quality. After all, they made my original xbox and it still works. If you know the specific name of the panels I can look up their datasheet and tell you if anything about them stands out.
If you want to compare warranties, last time I checked, ET Solar had a 10 year product warranty and a 25 year performance warranty. If Flextronics (or Flex as they are now called) offer a longer warranty than that in Australia, then it doesn’t necessary mean they are better, but it is a good sign.
The brochure they forwarded me is the sunedison F series 255w-275 w which comes up on dr google. Although it is sunedison, salesman stated they are made by flex anyway, and that the specs will be the same with the 260w panel.
Warranties are 10 years on the panel, inverter, mounting system and installation, with 25 years on performance. I guess that seems pretty good from others I have seen,
Really do appreciate your time on this and if I could buy you a virtual beer I would.
As far as I am aware, Flex makes all the panel with SunEdison’s name on them. Looking at their datasheet, I see nothing bad. Their temperature coefficient of Pmax is a little high, but it is almost the same as that of ET panels, so I wouldn’t worry about it. I see that in the United States their product and performance warranties are both 25 years. That’s good, but Australian Consumer Law is stronger, so it’s not surprising their product warranty is less here.
Hi, just a quick question.
I’ve just had 6.72kW of solar panels installed. They have installed a Solax-X1 Hybrid ready inverter with max D.C. power input at 5000 W and nominal AC output @ 4600W.
Does this seem right?
I live in mid north QLD with lots of sun and it seems that my power generation maxes out from about 9:30-3:30 at around 4kW,
Any help would be much appreciated.
Hi Shaun.
With 6.72 kilowatts of panels you are over the limit of 6.13 kilowatts of panels that would normally apply with a 4.6 kilowatt inverter, so you were lucky you were able to have that approved.
If you have 6.72 kilowatts of panels, then I would expect you to be producing around 4.6 kilowatts with a 4.6 kilowatt inverter under good conditions. I suggest keeping making notes of times and output on a clear day or days and then contacting your installer about it. I’d also check that you do have 6.72 kilowatts of panels.
This article covers factors that can reduce a system’s performance:
https://www.solarquotes.com.au/blog/5-reasons-your-solar-system-power-is-lower-than-you-expected/
Hi Finn.
We have installed a new solar system in melbourne. 20 x 290w black max gen 5 panels. We were quoted for 20 x s270 enphase microinverters. Bill arrived and it says 20 xs230 micro inverters installed. We are waiting for them to clarify if this is a typo or not. Wondering what your thoughts are on this situation if it turns out they have installed the smaller micro inverters. Might be ok …but if not…should we expect them to reinstall s270 or ask for a discount??
Hello Noella, Ronald here.
First of all, the good news is the output of your system should be basically identical whether you have 220 watt or 260 watt inverters. (The s230 is a 220 watt inverter and the s270 is 260 watts.) I go into why this is the case here:
https://www.solarquotes.com.au/blog/oversizing-solar-arrays/
But you definitely should receive what you have paid for and if you do have s230 inverters then you definitely should receive a refund in the difference in price between the two systems. If you didn’t receive what you paid for you can require them to replace the inverters with s270 ones, but that won’t be of much benefit to you so I’d suggest seeking a refund of the difference between the two types of systems.
If you can monitor the output of your system you may be able to see what sort of inverters you have there. If you are not able to do that, then a selfie stick might be the easiest way to see what kind of microinverters are under your panels. (If the selfie stick will let you take photos at the angle you want, that is.)
Hi Finn. Also we tried to read the micro inverters to see what size they are but its not visible. Easy way to identify for ourselves what is actually on our roof???
Thanks for your very informative website.
Hi Finn
just found your site with lots of good info, thanks.
I recently installed a 6.6 kw system (22 panels x 300kw) split into 2 arrays with 14 panels facing north, north east and 8 panels facing north west. we did this to maximise the amount of sun during the full day. It’s all hooked up to a Zeversolution 5000 single phase invertor.
My questions are:
With the split array I assume I will never get more than around 4.9 kw as all 22 panels will never get the same amount of sun on them at the same time and with the limitations of the invertor.
Secondly, My panel installer said that the net meter which will be installed shortly will provide power to all 3 phases to power our ducted air con. Is this correct? Currently all power from the panels are being fed into one phase only
Hi Peter, Ronald here.
Most of the time I’d definitely expect you to get under 5 kilowatts but I would still expect you to generate a little over 5 kilowatts under good conditions when the sun is in the right position.
You new electricity meter will only measure you net electricity consumption. So if you are drawing 1 kilowatt of grid electricity on one phase, 2 kilowatts of grid electricity on another phase, and exporting 2 kilowatts of solar electricity on the third phase, as far as your meter is concerned you are only using 1 kilowatt of grid electricity at that time. If you were instead exporting 4 kilowatts of solar electricity your meter would regard you as using no grid electricity and exporting 1 kilowatt to the grid.
I really don’t get it. An inverter is like a switched power supply. As long as you don’t exceed the max input voltage, you can connect as much panels as you want in a serial/parallel configuration!
The inverter will work at max power longer and that might shorten it’s life span a bit, but the return will outweigh that for sure.
The extra generated energy is just lost.
So if you are limited in inverter power like Australia, you can connect as many panels as you want.
It will start generating sooner and top off when reaching max output power and flat line at that level.
I’m an electrical engineer btw.
It is necessary to stay within the guidelines in order to receive our Small-scale Renewable Energy Scheme subsidy or “solar rebate” as it’s often called.
HI
WE HAD A 1.5 INVERTER FOR 10 YRS WITH SIX PANELS
HAVING GOT 2 INVERTERS NOW DIED. PANELS WERE 250W
BEEN ADVISED
WITH 1.5 INVERTER WE NEED 7 PANELS
ORIGIN STATE 1.5 WE CAN GO UP TO 9 PANELS
WHO IS RIGHT
REASON FOR STAYING WITH 1.5 AS WE GET 40C AND CURRENT IS 7C AND SOPME PROVIDERS UP TO 15 TO 20C. SO STAYING WITH 1.5
UNTIL 2028
Hi Maria
If your high solar feed-in tariff ends in 2028 I am guessing you are in Queensland. In Queensland, if you want to retain your high feed-in tariff your are not permitted to increase your solar panel capacity above what it was when the system was originally installed. So if you originally had 2 kilowatts of panels, which is the maximum for a 1.5 kilowatt inverter, you are not allowed to have more than that. So if Origin is saying you can have 9 panels they are probably referring to panels that have low wattage by today’s standards. For example nine 200 watt panels will come to 1.8 kilowatts. But if you have seven 250 watt panels will come to 1.75 kilowatts. So the number of panels you can have will depend on their size.
Here is the Queensland government page on the high feed-in tariff:
https://www.qld.gov.au/housing/buying-owning-home/energy-water-home/solar/feed-in-tariffs/solar-bonus-scheme-44c
Hi Finn & Ronald
Congratulations on a great site and a terrific service (quotes obtained).
Just wading through some offers for systems with some differences as follows.
1) 4.55 kW 14 x Qcell 325W panels and Fronius Primo 4 inverter,
2) 4.55 kW 14 x Qcell.DuoG5 325W panels & Enphase IQ7+ micros (seems to restrict output to 290W/module, so 4.13 kW?)
3) 4.2 kW 14 Solar Edge 300 panels with Solar Edge SE4000H inverters/optimisers.
Systems 1) and 3) are within $500 of each other, whilst System 2 is understandably is $800 – $1300 more.
Questions – any preferences with any of these system?
(I’m hoping with good placement, won’t require great shading considerations, though with the Solar Edge system would take care of that concern for not much extra.)
Are Solar Edge products well known and supported. Would LG panels or similar with 25 yr product warranty be worth it. How much extra might that cost. Also the Fronius warranty periods seem inconsistent, 5yrs, sometimes 5+5 years. Different!
Your thoughts
With thanks
Roy
Hi Roy, Ronald here.
QCELLS are a good quality panel with a 12 year product warranty while Fronius is a good quality inverter. The Fronius warranty is a little confusing because it is given as 5 years full warranty where they will pay for a new unit and the cost of replacing it if required and then they have an extra 5 years in which they will provide a new inverter but not the labour cost.
There is no problem putting a 325 watt panel on a 290 watt IQ7+ microinverter. Panels very rarely produce their full rated output so this isn’t really a problem.
SolarEdge panels may be rebranded QCELLS panels or they may be another panel that has been given the SolarEdge brand. I would say SolarEdge is well supported in Australia, although I don’t know what the financial situation of the company is. Hopefully they will be around long term.
Whether or not it is worthwhile paying extra for optimizers or micorinverters depends on how much shade your roof has. If there is no significant shade then they may increase output by around 3%. If there is severe shading they can increase output by up to 25% but I think that would only happen under exceptional circumstances. There is a good chance you will be better off spending the extra money on getting a larger solar system. For example, a 6.5 kilowatt solar system — assuming there is enough room on your roof.
You can check out different panels and their prices on our panel table here:
https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/comparison/compare-solar-panels/
LG panels might add a couple thousand dollars to the cost of 4.55 kilowatt system.
Many thanks Ronald.
We currently use around 9 kWh daily across all four quarters of the year, so the larger system would still be warranted?
Cheers
Roy
Your electricity consumption is below average, but for most people with your consumption it will be worthwhile to get a larger system with a 5 kilowatt inverter and close to the maximum solar panel capacity of 6.66 kilowatts. If you get a system that is 2 kilowatts larger than what you are planning it might produce around 8 extra kilowatt-hours a day. Even if you send all the extra electricity produced into the grid, even if your feed-in tariff is only 10 cents that will still earn you around $290 a year. If the larger system costs you an extra $1,500 they will pay for themselves in around 5 years. As you will be using a portion of the power they produce the actual results will be a little better.
Yeah thanks Ronald. I’ve taken up the option of a 5.2kW system which still has a good ROI, payback and savings/annum which should be ok, and not too exxy.
Many thanks for your help and the great site.
Glad to help.
Hi all. I am installing 22 x 350W LG Neon 2 panels with a 3 phase Fronius Symo inverter. The system is an awkward 7.7kW. My question is which inverter to get. The 6kW or the 7kW inverter? According to guidelines I can use either but which one is going to be more efficient?
(I can’t find the efficiency curves on the Fronius website or product brochures either.)
Hi James
Looking at the Fronius Symo Datasheet I see it doesn’t show the efficiency curve for the 6 and 7 kilowatt inverters, but the trend is for an improved curve with larger size, making the 7 kilowatt slightly more efficient. The Euro efficiency of the 7 kilowatt inverter is 0.1 percentage points more efficient than the 6 kilowatt inverter. Clipping loses with the 6 kilowatt inverter would be trivial and I’d expect they’d be non-existent with the 7 kilowatt inverter. Perhaps the larger inverter would result in around a dozen extra kilowatt-hours of generation per year. Since the larger inverter is likely to cost a few hundred extra dollars you could get the 6 kilowatt inverter and put the money saved towards getting 355 watt LG Neon panels. That might give you 150+ kilowatt-hours a year. (I’m assuming you don’t have space for extra panels.)
Hi,we have installed 6.61 kw of panels but a 5 kw inverter. Does that sound right
Hi David
That’s a normal arrangement. Because solar panels rarely provide their full rated output and because they cost much less than they used to, it makes sense to have panel capacity that is higher than the inverter capacity. Very little output is lost and if your panels are in two arrays that face different directions you are likely to lose no output at all.
If you are interested, this article goes into details:
https://www.solarquotes.com.au/blog/oversizing-solar-arrays/
Hi Finn,
Need your advice, I am tossing up between a FRONIUS Primo 5 kW 1 Phase 2 MPPT Int (PRIMO 5.0-1) and a SOLIS 4G 5 kW 1 Phase 2 MPPT w/wifi 5+5 (Solis-1P5K-4G). There is $900 difference in price between the two. Does that sound right? and why is the Fronius more expensive. What does it do better?
Hi Sona, Ronald here.
Fronius inverters have a very good reputation. As they are a premium product they cost more and having to pay $900 more is normal. Generally speaking, the Fronius and the Solis will are both good inverters and will do the same job, but I would expect the Fronius to last longer. One drawback of the Fronius is they have a cooling fan that can make a considerable amount of noise when its sunny, so you may want to choose a Solis if it is going to be located where that noise may be a problem.
Thanks. Can i also ask about the panels. i am looking at installing 18 x TRINA Honey M Perc Mono 370W Black 35mm MC4 Landscape (TSM-370DD08M.08(II)). Are these good?
Those are panels we can recommend. These are not high end premium panels, but they are still good quality and can be expected to last for decades without problem. They have a 25 year performance warranty and a 15 year product warranty. If wanted extra reassurance you can pay for panels with a 25 year produce warranty, but they will cost more.
Provided the installer does good quality work, you shouldn’t have a problem. When using good quality hardware such as Trina panels and a Fronius or Solis inverter, the quality of the installation becomes the limiting factor.
Thanks Ronald. Much appreciated !
Hi Finn,
I have installed a 40KW system (80x Trina 500w panels) with a Sungrow 30KW inverter. After installing the system we discovered the AC output of this model is 29.9KW (even though Sungrow design software shows 30KW). This has resulted in the STC’s being rejected as the inverter to array ratio is 133.7%. Ive sent emails to both the CEC and CER to see what we can do to resolve the problem.
Any comments or suggestions would be appreciated.
Cheers,
Hi John
Anthony says he’ll email you, so keep an eye out for that.