There have been many mentions of “lack of reserve” at various levels during the electricity crisis in Australia’s eastern states – what does it all mean?
We’re living in interesting times; times that Leader of the Opposition Peter Dutton is already blaming on Labor. Some (many) would argue it was nine years of a Coalition government faffing about with energy policy that led to this point. Well, that and Putin’s invasion of Ukraine – which certainly hasn’t helped things.
But if we had more renewables backed by storage in the system, the situation wouldn’t have become as serious.
Anyhow, it is what it is and currently things are still a little shaky in terms of electricity supply in states part of the currently-suspended National Electricity Market (NEM). The unprecedented suspension was implemented by the Australian Energy Market Operator on Wednesday. The reason:
“AEMO has taken this step because it has become impossible to continue operating the spot market while ensuring a secure and reliable supply of electricity for consumers in accordance with the NER.”
Since suspending the spot market, AEMO has been able to manage electricity supply more effectively. As at 4.30pm yesterday, it was still too early for the AEMO to say when the market will resume normal operations.
What Is The AEMO’s Role?
Among the AEMO’s functions is oversight of the operations and security of the NEM power system in eastern and south-eastern Australia. The AEMO keeps very close tabs on what’s happening 24/7/365 to ensure the capacity to generate and transport energy can meet demand – and that’s a really fine balance to maintain. But there also needs to be a buffer, because Murphy’s Law applies.
When the AEMO doesn’t think there will be enough spare capacity ready to rock, it starts squawking about “Lack Of Reserve”; or LOR to its friends. The AEMO initially encourages generators to play ball to meet the forecast shortfall, and failing that, it pushes them to. It seems electricity generators really like being pushed as they make more money that way – and that’s part of the problem that led to the NEM suspension.
Lack Of Reserve: 3 Levels
LOR conditions come in three increasingly unpleasant flavours:
- LOR1 – when reserve levels are lower than the two largest supply resources in a state.
- LOR2 – when reserve levels are lower than the single largest supply resource in a state.
- LOR3 – when the available electricity supply is equal to or less than the operational demand. In other words, no reserve.
In an LOR1 situation, the AEMO asks generators to put their hands up to commit to supply, or large electricity consumers to dial back their consumption. In an LOR2 scenario, the AEMO has the clout to direct generators or activate the Reliability & Emergency Reserve Trader (RERT) mechanism to improve the situation.
If an LOR3 situation is forecast, the AEMO keeps pushing and prepares to engage “load shedding”, also known as rotating outages. This means cutting supply in chosen areas for reasonably short periods (45 minutes usually) on a rotating basis for as long as the situation exists. A group of areas get their plugs pulled first, then plugged back in; then the next locations in line cop it and so on.
This load-shedding is to prevent the whole system potentially suffering serious damage. The comparative few are (temporarily) sacrificed for the good of the many, otherwise the many may be in the dark for a really long time – what’s referred to as a black system event.
If you’re interested in taking a look at AEMO Lack Of Reserve notices, there have been plenty to read here. Note that many are forecasts, and like weather forecasts can change but tend to become more accurate closer to the anticipated event. If the event can’t be avoided in time, it then becomes an “actual LOR” and it’s time to cross fingers.
There’s also a handy info-sheet explaining Lack of Reserve (LOR) notices here.
Load Shedding And Home Solar
For Australian households with a solar power system and a home battery capable of backing up critical loads in a blackout (not all are), a typical load shedding event wouldn’t be such a big deal.
But generally speaking, if a household just has solar panels installed and the area is subject to load shedding, then that household is in the same boat as its neighbours. Solar inverters have what’s called “anti-islanding protection“, an important safety feature that shuts them down in a blackout situation.
Whether buying a solar battery with backup capability is worth it given load shedding events are pretty rare and should be brief is a personal choice. For many battery buyers, it may be part of a purchase decision but not the sole reason. You can learn more about the pros and cons of home energy storage in SolarQuotes Founder Finn’s 101 guides to understanding, buying and owning solar battery systems.
Bruce Robertson, energy finance analyst (from IEEFA) said on The Project last night:
“The power crisis is only in part of Australia; like one-third of Australia – the whole of Western Australia – ah, it’s business-as-usual over there.”
https://twitter.com/theprojecttv/status/1537354102677594112
https://twitter.com/barobertson111/status/1537407190528847872
Simples!!! ?
Not all home batteries are capable of backing up critical loads in blackouts? Wouldn’t it be more accurate to say most households with batteries aren’t armageddon proof and thus will still go black when the power dies? Or am I confusing 3 phase battery systems with single phase systems?
As for load shedding events being pretty rare, while most blackouts probably aren’t due to load shedding, there’s been at least 6 blackouts here this year. Some were only short enough to crash everything and corrupt the daily\monthly\yearly inverter data, others were somewhat longer.
As frustrating as blackouts are, an armageddon proof battery system still isn’t a financially viable option – unless you aren’t looking at a finance based ROI.
What I have been saying previously is that Electricity can be cheap in Australia. For example in Iran (middle east oil production Country) and Venezuela (south American oil production Country) these Countries sell their petrol (fuel) around AUD$0.05 (Iran & Iraq) to AUD $0.25 a litter. These countries sell domestically fuel cheap.
When it comes to Australia the fossil fuel and wheat are sold at Commodity Price Set by Australian Federal Govt or the relevant Board looking over Commodities in Australia.
Simple Question – Why not our GAS and Wheat and national products can be sold at local reduced price so to suit AUSTRALIAN FAMILIES.
WHEN WILL AUSTRALIAN’s SPEAK OUT TO DEFEND THEMSELVES. No one from outside will come to aid Australian Families.
Please raise this topic in the Australian Public so everyone should demand the Government to reduce price for local goods at local price and not following the Commodity Price.
Ronnal, I’m afraid that if you make wheat farmers sell grain to Australians at below the international price then you hurt the wheat farmers and they will have less money to spend in their communities. If you compensate the wheat farmers with money collected through taxation, then you hurt everyone. There is no easy solution where making Australian producers supply Australians at lower prices makes Australians better off.
There is the Federal Government and State Governments owning their own coal mines rather than taking royalties from BHP, RIO TINTO. There can be subcontractors engaged by Federal Government and State Governments to run the mines.
A question to you Ronald Brakels in response to my comments: Iran, Iraq and others (oil production countries) being the Members of OPEC way their fuel sale to their locals very cheap than others. https://statisticstimes.com/economy/countries-by-petrol-prices-and-gdp-per-capita.php
This a a Fact.
Australia can produce GAS and Coal for local use as cheap price.
Australia can supply gas at a low price to Australians, but it can’t sell the same gas for a high price to Singaporeans.
Assume the following 3 things:
1. You are Australian and you own one gigajoule of gas.
2. You can sell this gigajoule of gas to other Australians for $1, or…
3. You can sell it to Singapore for $10.
Which choice makes Australia better off?