Whilst we usually try to make our blog posts understandable to almost anyone, this post will get technical, as I show, with numbers, why the new 1000-volt limit for residential solar makes life better for installers and homeowners alike.
Australian solar installers are celebrating now that the latest version of the Australian Standard for solar inverters – AS4777 – has allowed domestic systems to increase to 1000 volts DC.
My first inverter was, and still is a Latronics PVE 2500. Made in Queensland, it’s a basic box. With one high current MPPT input, the specifications were very inflexible.
You could have up to four strings in parallel, but a maximum of only 206 volts meant four 45 volt solar panels in series (4 panels x 45v = 180V) was the only string configuration; take it or leave it. This made things awkward when salespeople mistakenly contracted for 6 panels, leaving installers to explain to customers they had to spend $1800 for two more.
Europeans Also Had Inflexible Inverters
It makes for swearing when the sticker on the side of an SMA SunnyBoy 2500 says 180 – 500VDC input, and your meter measures 200V, but it still won’t fire up. 45-volt nominal panels can be a little doughy on a hot summer morning when there are only six panels in series and two strings in parallel.
We soon learnt that despite being outside the allowable 500VDC maximum, a single string of 12 was the only option for these units, and SMA arrived at the same conclusion despite their reputation of being conservative about blowing up inverters. Because cold solar panels are more efficient, SMA had to handle overperforming arrays in sub-zero alpine Germany, but Australian heat made panels less efficient, helping SMA deliver Australian units with a 600VDC limit applied.
Now We Have Amazing Breadth
These days, inverters have wide operating windows. Starting at 40VDC, you can use a 2-panel (!) array or 13 panels for 600VDC—except if it’s a Sungrow 8 or 10kW hybrid series. Their 4 MPPT inputs have some funky little problems with needing a relatively balanced voltage, not more than 150VDC spread between them. I haven’t heard a good explanation yet for this issue.
Harmonisation Is Singing From The Same Book
When the last AS4777 was written, a spurious clause limited grid-connected inverter systems to 600V, creating a ludicrous situation where 1000v domestic systems were allowed by AS5033, but only if they were off-grid. With demarcation between standards now, they’re harmonised because they refer to, but don’t cross over, other related solar standards.
However, New Zealand is still using 20-year-old standards. They publish them, but the government fails to cite them in legislation. With 300+ updates needed, you’re more likely to sight a Tasmanian tiger there before citing AS/NZ4777.2024.
600 volts DC Suits Single Phase
Electrically, it’s not hard to fully load a 5 or 6kW inverter with a couple of strings under 600 volts. The Fronius Primo 8.2 is the only unit I readily recall as single-phase and 1000-volt input.
It’s actually a matter of inverter topology. Anything is possible, but inside the box, it’s easier to convert sub 600VDC to 230VAC, whereas 1000VDC is more efficient when you want 400VAC output for 3 phases.
Despite Enphase and their acolytes’ braying about the inherent safety of low-voltage DC 1, the vast majority of solar power systems use string inverters.
The real advantage is the ability to significantly oversize the solar array while staying under the standard 10kW inverter limit imposed by the networks.
For those playing at home, multiplying 15 panels by 38 volts and arriving at 570 volts sounds simple, but once you uprate the output for low temperature at your locale, 13 or 14 panels become the practical limit.
Manufacturers have programs to make calculations easy, but when you add extra Australian rules, using software becomes essential to cover all the variables
Let’s consider a LONGi Hi-MO 5m 54c 420W:
- Maximum Power (Pmax): 420W
- Open Circuit Voltage (Voc): 37.3V
- Short Circuit Current (Isc): 14.12A
- Maximum Power Point Voltage (Vmp): 31.0V
- Maximum Power Point Current (Imp): 13.55A
1000 volts Puts More Power Into The Same Circuit
In round numbers, using 38V panels, a string of 14 in series will generate 532Volts open circuit (Voc)
Under ideal conditions, the array develops 5.86kW, that’s 434 volts maximum power (Vmp) multiplied by 13.5amps. (Imp)
Now, if we are allowed to increase to 1000VDC, then 24 panels develop 912Voc.
This means 24 panels develop 744Volts (Vmp) multiplied by 13.5 amps (Imp) so you have 10kW from the same circuit.
Using higher voltage on the same cable also offers lower losses.
Industrial Is Already 1000VDC
Higher voltage systems have been allowed on commercial building for years, provided switchgear is secured or inverters are in cages.
“Restricted access” has now been turned on its head though, “readily available” is now the key phrase in AS4777, so school kids could fiddle with the switches.
3 Phase Needs 1000VDC
As solar energy became cheap and large systems became much more feasible, we ran into problems.
Inverters designed for 1000V input couldn’t be “filled up” without exceeding 600VDC.
Parallel strings help, but current ratings for panels rose faster than inverter ratings, making parallel arrays impossible with cheaper units. Moreover, anything but the simplest roof could also make physical layouts problematic.
The upshot? Filling your roof with solar was more expensive because you had to buy more inverters to work under the artificial ceiling.
If We Use The Old 2016 Rules:
In the complex example above, strings would be limited to 13 panels for a temperature-corrected 570Voc. A Sungrow inverter would be stuck at 4 strings of 13, an underwhelming total of 52 panels and 16.38kW
The inimitable Fronius Symo handles 3 strings in parallel for channel 1, then 2 strings paralleled for channel 2, so the total could be brought back up to 3 x 13 + 2 x 12 = 63 panels total…
However, while using an extra parallel string solves the electrical design problem, it also adds another panel. This is great news, except the physical arrangement on the roof would no longer work because there are 17 panels facing West in the example.
It’s like Tetris with a third dimension. Removing or adding a single panel can ruin a layout like this, causing much teeth gnashing for installers, designers and customers.
The Future Is Brighter with 1000V
These AS4777 updates have finally aligned Australian standards with global ones, allowing residential solar to reach its full potential. By increasing the allowable voltage to 1000V, the new regulations will make solar installations more efficient, cost-effective, and flexible.
For installers, this means less frustration and more design options. For homeowners, it means more power, lower costs, and faster payback on solar investments.
The future of solar in Australia just got a lot brighter—and a lot more powerful.
Footnotes
- Finn loves being teased, I hope ↩
What a great read again, thanks .
Solar is moving fast sales guys are not across all the current details.
Your tech talk is essential to provide clarity to the consumer, it keeps the wool out of our eyes.
Thank Kel,
I just hope all the numbers are correct, electricians are a tough crowd to write for sometimes.
Cheers
Yes , electricians can be a bit like doctors, they only know what they’ve been taught and can’t always think outside the box.
Thanks for thinking about what’s best for the customer, for them to maximise returns , and pushing the so called boundaries.
Have a great day
Ross
Very interesting article.
Are there any negatives to 1,000 volts?
high voltage, high risk, unless sparky did a good job on the terminal
Hi Allen
For a given amount of energy, higher voltage means lower current, and that means less heat.
Bad terminations are made worse by thermal cycles which eventually case fires.
High voltage is only a risk in terms of it’s ability to jump gaps & find weakness in insulation.
1000V is a welcome improvement over the old 600V limit, but only works in our benefit if the PV oversizing is 200% and not 160% per Sigenergy when using a battery.
As the maximum 3-phase inverter in WA is 15kV then the maximum panel layout is 24kW for the Sigenergy 3-phase inverters irrespective of the new 1000V PV allowance.
hi Anthony,
a quick check on SB2500 datasheet indicate a startup voltage of 300V, surely that explains why the inverter isnt fired up?
https://www.adelaidesolarsafe.com.au/docs/sb/SB1200_3000-DAU104411W.pdf
I don’t think that Sungrow asterisk is actually a hard rule.
My SH10RS loaded up with 4 strings of wildly different sizes (from 6 panels to 15 panels) just today had one string at 208v while another string was at 442v and it seems perfectly happy.
Incidentally around this time it was also making 11.2kw of power. My best guess is when the battery can charge at 10kw and the AC inverter can do 10kw the “limits” can be bent a bit since neither one of them is going past 10kw.
Seems like a incredibly flexible topology in those inverters. 🙂
About 12 months ago, we installed 24 panels into a single phase inverter, despite having 3 phases in the house. The advice at the time was that there was not going to be much of a difference, and 3 Phase inverters were problematic in Australia.
Does the 1000v decision change things for me, and is it worth upgrading to a 3 phase inverter?
Hi Jon, I hope your single phase x 24 panels are working well. It may not be cost effective to change the inverter so early in its life. 3 phase in my view is better but not directly effected by 1000 volt new supply level.
Unfortunately advice is not the best in this field, it is influenced by what a sales office is pitching at the time.
Deep education in my view is required to make a semi future proof decision as much as you can. PV is rapidly on the move and has been for a while now. Making it very difficult to decipher information, this site is one of the better ones to bed down trends and tech.
I am not in the biz but I am a user and like you seek to upgrade. I have had a single phase 5kw for 13 years going strong good gear I got lucky, when my inverter fails that’s the time I’m going to get serious about that upgrade to 3phase and maybe 1000volt input. Good luck Jon.
Thanks Kel,
The advice on staying SIngle Phase was common across suppliers and info on the Solar Quotes site. Apparently, there are issues with 3 Phase inverters meeting Australian standards – as I understand it.
Your suggested approach makes sense – wait – if the inverter needs replacement in the future, then look at what best works at the time.
Cheers
Jon
cAN YOU ADVISE IF THIS MEANS THAT RECENTLY INSTALLED SYSTEMS CAN BE ADJUSTED TO USE THIS BENEFIT PLEASE?
Hi Sean,
The update of AS4777.1.2024 changes a few things so if you want to reconfigure an existing system, the whole thing has to be brought up to the new standard. You can’t just pick 1000v and include the rest of the rules.
The voltage increase at 0C only makes sense at 20C.
Are installers designing smaller systems based on a theoretical limit rather than real world operating conditions?
Great article Anthony, thanks for posting. Could you please confirm that 1000v strings are also allowed per AS/NZS 5033:2021 and AS/NZS 3000, as well as the updated 2024 AS/NZS 4777.1 mentioned above. Thanks!
Hi Andrew,
AS5033 has allowed 1000v since the 2021 update, it’s only been inverters covered under AS4777 that has prevented 1000v grid connection.
Thanks Anthony, how about AS/NZS 3000, does that allow 1000v strings?
Hi Andrew,
There’s nothing in AS3000 to prohibit 1000v strings but don’t take my word for it… 😉